Meet Your New Experimental Sex Drug: Flibanserin
17 Nov 2009
Pharmaceutical maker Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) is looking to create a lot of pre-emptive buzz for its gamble on the female sex drug market, flibanserin. Flibanserin is being developed as a non-hormonal treatment for low sexual desire in women, a market that’s thought to be more financially lucrative than even the $2 billion dollar erectile dysfunction market.
On Monday they orchestrated several media releases, webcasts, and a presentation at a major sexual medicine conference in Europe, all to release data from Phase III trials on pre-menopausal women labeled with low sex drive (also known as hypoactive sexual desire disorder, or HSDD). The next few days and weeks will reveal how effective this first of many blitzes is likely to be.
All of this has everything to do with marketing and little to do with science. The data hasn’t been released and no breakthroughs have been discovered. Still it’s an opportunity to get a little more acquainted with a drug that changes brain chemistry and they hope will change, or direct, the global conversation on female sexuality.
Defining Sexual Desire
Sexual desire is a difficult thing to define, as even researchers involved in the flibanserin studies acknowledge. The model presented by BI researchers involves breaking down desire into three elements, which include:
Drive, referring to spontaneous sexual interest that is somehow biological or hardwired (what that actually looks like is only a guess).
Belief & values, including social, cultural, ethnic, religious, and other factors that impact how often we might feel sexual desire, how intensely we feel it, and how comfortable we are with it.
Motivation, which considers all the psychological and interpersonal factors creating a willingness to be sexual and feel sexual desire.
The pitch from BI researchers is that while good treatments exist for low sexual desire caused by beliefs, values, and motivation, we don’t have anything to treat the drive component (which they call the “biologic” component). They believe that flibanserin treats the drive component of sexual desire.
How It Works
What they don’t know is how flibanserin is supposed to achieve this. They know that the drug reduces serotonin levels, and their current guess is that it impacts sexual desire by reducing inhibitory effects in the brain (basically it’s removing whatever is stopping you from feeling desire). But this is just a guess.
What It Does
On Monday November 15 the company did a major media push, releasing some of the data from their clinical trials with pre-menopausal women who had been diagnosed with HSDD. They released data at a sexual medicine conference, through media releases, and via phone/webcasts (one of which I listened in on). Here’s a summary of what they have released:
BI conducted several studies in North America and Europe involving over 5,000 pre-menopausal women who had been diagnosed with HSDD. In their publicity campaign, they focus on the North American studies (more on that below) and included just over 1300 women. The average age was 35 and most of the women were married and the average length of relationships was over 10 years.
The women were assessed for both desire and distress caused by desire and then followed for 6 months. Every day the women were asked to record their subjective evaluation of their own sexual desire and their sexual activities, defined as Satisfying Sexual Events (SSEs). One particularly nice aspect of the study was that sexual events weren’t defined solely as intercourse or orgasm. An SSE was defined as sexual intercourse, oral sex, masturbation or genital stimulation by the partner, which was subjectively evaluated by the woman as satisfying (with prompts like gratifying, fulfilling, satisfactory and/or successful).
Comparing the women taking daily doses of flibanserin with women taking a placebo, the pooled data show:
Women taking flibanserin increased their SSEs by 1.7 per month while on the drug. Women taking the placebo had 1 more satisfying sexual event per month while taking the placebo.
Women taking flibanserin reported an increase in sexual desire and a reduction in distress about sexual desire. Women taking the placebo also reported increase desire and decreased distress, but the difference between the two groups was statistically significant.
Notably, in the European study there wasn’t a significant increase in sexually satisfying events.
Questions Remain
To be fair, BI hasn’t completed it’s research. At the same time they are making the calculated business decision to get publicity for this data, so it also seems fair to start raising questions now about what they are reporting.
They haven’t offered any rationale for why the drug produced statistically significant results in the “biologic” component in North American but not in Europe. I suspect the answer to that question may be messy as it would likely refer back to non-”biologic” elements of sexual desire, thus pointing out a problem with the premise of the research.
After the six month study there were participants who stopped taking the drug reported that their sexual desire did not diminish. Whether this suggests that the drug is having a permanent effect on brain chemistry, or that brain chemistry is not in fact a significant factor in most cases of low sexual desire remains to be explained.
Finally, I was interested to hear one of the researchers say that most women in the study reported that their low sexual desire crept up on them over a period of time. If, as the researchers argue, problems with low desire are drive related, hard-wired or biological, why would they appear slowly? Are they suggesting there are precipitating factors influencing low sexual desire? If so, would effective treatment not want to address those factors before they go altering the brain chemistry of otherwise healthy women? One consideration in a low desire creep may be age, but these studies were of pre-menopausal women with an average age of 35. These seem like pretty important questions to consider.
What What We Don’t Know
Currently the only safety data we have is for women who have been on flibanserin for six months. They have been following women for over a year (after the studies are done women are given the option of continuing on the drug) but haven’t released data on those women. In a telephone media presentation researchers propose that no significant safety risk is expected to emerge. This seems a little like hubris given the “unexpected” discoveries of risks associated with long term use of SSRIs, which weren’t found in clinical testing.
We also don’t know when flibanserin would be an appropriate treatment. Is it meant to be a first line treatment or used only when safer, more proven treatment options have been exhausted? Once the media and a splashy BI advertising campaign create the myth of a pill that’ll make you want sex, how prepared are physicians going to be to explain the actual complicated nature of desire, never mind finding the time to do it versus the time it takes to write a prescription.
The Bottom Line (for now):
In truth, it’s much too early to be evaluating the potential benefit versus harm of flibanserin. It’s a smart strategy on the part of pharmaceutical companies to generate press for a drug that’s not yet approved as a way of mobilizing a lazy media, generating a public buzz and setting the terms of the public discussion on the topic. Unfortunately what’s good for business isn’t always good for public health.
Read more – Petra Boynton Offers a Behind the Scenes Look at the Flibanserin Release
Related – Bloomberg News: Desire Drug May Prove Sex Really Is All in Her Head
Boehringer Ingelheim Press Release – Boehringer Ingelheim Announces Pivotal Phase III Data of Flibanserin in Pre-Menopausal Women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder
| | Twitter | Newsletter Signup | Sexuality Forum | |
Meet Your New Experimental Sex Drug: Flibanserin originally appeared on About.com Sexuality on Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 at 00:01:12.
Permalink | Comment | Email this
Continued here:
Meet Your New Experimental Sex Drug: Flibanserin

Man cannot live alone. This saying has echoed through the years and is very true today. A man gets into relationships so that he is able to maintain adequate emotional and physical well-being. Sex plays a very important role in these relationships and thus cannot be ignored. 2 out of 5 men find it hard to satisfy their women in bed and Erectile Dysfunction has only made things worse. Erectile Dysfunction is definitely a very common occurrence but do we hear about it often?
Prior to VigaPlus™, doctors and urologists had a tough time treating patients with Erectile Dysfunction symptoms. Such patients were usually advised to undergo counseling and anti-stress treatments without dealing with the main disease(Erectile Dysfunction ) itself. Things have changed for the best and a lot of doctors recommend VigaPlus™ to their patients. The fact that VigaPlus™ is herbal and with no side-effects is reason enough for these doctors to promote our products and the happiness that they see on their patients faces is reward enough.